Can & Could
Ability, possibility, permission, and polite requests. Could is the past form of can and is also used for more polite or tentative expressions.
- "I can to go" ❌ — never use to directly after a modal: I can go.
- "She cans cook" ❌ — modals never take -s for third person.
- Using could to express one specific past achievement: "Yesterday I could win" ❌ → "Yesterday I managed to win / was able to win."
- Confusing can't (present impossibility) with couldn't (past inability).
- Use could for polite requests — it sounds softer and more formal than can.
- For future ability, use will be able to instead of can: "I will be able to drive next year."
- Can't for deduction = 100% certainty it's NOT true: "That can't be right!"
May & Might
Possibility, permission (formal), and speculation. Might expresses a weaker or more remote possibility than may.
- Using maybe (one word, adverb) and may be (modal + be) interchangeably: "Maybe he is right" ≠ "He may be right" — both correct but different structures.
- Asking questions with might: "Might you come?" is technically correct but sounds very stiff — prefer "Will you come? / Are you coming?"
- Using may not to mean prohibition — it only means "possibly not." For prohibition use must not.
Must
Strong obligation, necessity, and logical deduction. Must not = prohibition (not allowed). Has no past form — use had to for past obligation.
- Mustn't vs don't have to: mustn't = forbidden; don't have to = not required.
- There is no past tense of must for obligation — always use had to.
- "Must to go" ❌ — no infinitive marker after must.
Should
Advice, recommendations, expectations, and mild obligation. Weaker than must.
Will & Would
Future decisions & predictions (will); polite requests, conditionals, and past habits (would).
Shall
Formal offers and suggestions (with I/We), formal future (British English), and strong obligations in legal/official language.
Have to / Don't have to
External obligation (rules, laws, circumstances) vs. absence of obligation.
- "He have to go" ❌ → 3rd person: he has to go.
- "Don't have to" does NOT mean "must not" — it means there's no obligation.
- Future: use will have to — "You will have to wait."
Need to / Don't need to
Necessity and absence of necessity. Softer than must.
Be able to
Alternative to can/could — usable in all tenses where modals cannot go.
Ought to
Similar to should — moral obligation or expectation. More formal, less common.
Used to
Past habits or states that no longer exist. Only used in the past.
- used to + base verb — past habit/state (no longer true): "I used to smoke."
- be used to + -ing / noun — accustomed to: "I am used to the noise."
- get used to + -ing / noun — becoming accustomed: "He's getting used to driving on the left."
- must — 95–100% certain (positive): "She must be home — the light is on."
- can't / couldn't — 95–100% certain (negative): "That can't be right — it's impossible."
- should — fairly certain / expected: "The package should arrive today."
- may — ~50% possibility: "He may come, I'm not sure."
- might / could — ~30–40% possibility: "It might snow tomorrow."
- Scale: must → should → may → might/could → can't
- "She must be tired" (present deduction) vs "She must have been tired" (past deduction).
- Never use must not for deduction — use can't: "She can't be 50, she looks 30!"
- Can you...? — informal/casual: "Can you help me?"
- Could you...? — more polite, slightly formal: "Could you close the door?"
- Would you...? — formal request: "Would you like to sit down?"
- Will you...? — less formal than would: "Will you pass the salt?"
- May I...? — formal asking for permission: "May I ask a question?"
- Shall I...? — offer to do something: "Shall I carry that for you?"
- Would you mind + -ing — very polite: "Would you mind moving your car?"
- Must — strong personal obligation or inner conviction: "I must call her — she needs me."
- Have to — external obligation (rules, laws, circumstances): "I have to wear a uniform at work."
- Should — advice, recommendation, mild obligation: "You should drink more water."
- Ought to — moral obligation, similar to should but more formal: "You ought to apologise."
- Need to — necessity, slightly softer than must: "She needs to see a doctor."
- Should have done — regret or criticism: "I should have studied more." / "You shouldn't have said that."
- Could have done — missed possibility: "She could have won, but she gave up."
- Might have done — past possibility: "He might have left already."
- Must have done — past deduction (certain): "You must have been exhausted."
- Can't have done — past impossibility: "She can't have forgotten — she just texted me."
- Would have done — 3rd conditional (unreal past): "I would have come if you had asked."
- Needn't have done — did it but it was unnecessary: "You needn't have cooked so much."
- Modal + to ❌: Core modals (can, will, must, should, may, might, shall, would, could) are NEVER followed by to. "I can to swim" ❌ → "I can swim."
- Modal + -ing ❌: Modals are followed by the base verb, not -ing. "She should going" ❌ → "She should go."
- Double modals ❌: Never stack two core modals: "I will can do it" ❌ → Use be able to: "I will be able to do it."
- Third-person -s ❌: Modals never add -s: "She cans" ❌, "He wills" ❌, "She musts" ❌.
- Pronunciation: "could" /kʊd/, "would" /wʊd/, "should" /ʃʊd/ — the "l" is silent in all three.
- Modal + have past form: "should have gone" — spoken quickly as "should've gone" — NOT "should of gone" (common spelling error).
- Mustn't vs. don't have to: the most dangerous confusion — always check which meaning you intend (prohibition vs. no obligation).
- May not vs can't: "It may not be true" = possibly not true. "It can't be true" = impossible.
- can / could — ability context: manage, skill, talent, succeed, achieve
- may / might — uncertainty context: perhaps, possibly, probably, not sure, I think, maybe
- must — obligation context: required, rule, law, necessary, essential, compulsory
- should — advice context: recommend, suggest, advise, it's better if, ought
- will / would — future/conditional context: tomorrow, if…then, planning, promise, offer
- shall — offer context: let me, may I help, should I, we together
What Are Coordinating Conjunctions?
They join two equal, independent elements — words, phrases, or complete clauses. The acronym FANBOYS is the standard mnemonic: For, And, Nor, But, Or, Yet, So.
For — Reason / Cause
Introduces a reason or explanation. Formal; rarely used in speech. Similar to "because" but always follows the main clause.
And — Addition
Adds one idea to another. Can join words, phrases, or clauses.
Nor — Negative Addition
Adds another negative idea after a negative statement. Often paired with neither.
But — Contrast / Exception
Introduces contrast, contradiction, or an exception. One of the most common conjunctions in English.
Or, Yet & So
Or = choice/alternative. Yet = contrast (stronger than but). So = result/consequence.
- Comma splice — joining two independent clauses with only a comma and no conjunction: "She came home, she was tired" ❌ → "She came home, and she was tired."
- Missing comma before a conjunction joining two full clauses: "She studied hard but she failed" ❌ → "She studied hard, but she failed."
- Using so and because together: "Because it rained, so we stayed in" ❌ — use one or the other.
- Confusing yet (conjunction) with yet (adverb): "I haven't eaten yet" (adverb) vs. "It was cold, yet we swam" (conjunction).
- Using nor without inverting the subject: "nor she came" ❌ → "nor did she come."
- For → reason/cause (formal): because, since, as
- And → addition, sequence: also, too, in addition, furthermore
- Nor → negative addition: neither, not either
- But → contrast, exception: however, on the other hand, except
- Or → choice, alternative, warning: otherwise, either, alternatively
- Yet → strong contrast/surprise: nevertheless, still, however
- So → result, consequence: therefore, thus, as a result
What Are Subordinating Conjunctions?
They introduce a dependent (subordinate) clause that cannot stand alone. The dependent clause adds context — time, cause, condition, concession, purpose, etc. — to the main clause.
Time Conjunctions
Show when something happens in relation to something else.
Cause & Reason Conjunctions
Explain why something happens.
Conditional Conjunctions
Express conditions under which something will happen (or not).
Concession Conjunctions
Introduce a contrasting idea that doesn't prevent the main clause from being true.
Purpose, Result & Comparison Conjunctions
Express why, with what outcome, and in what way comparisons are made.
- Using will after time/conditional conjunctions: "When she will arrive" ❌ → "When she arrives."
- Although … but — double concession: "Although it was late but I stayed" ❌ → drop but.
- Because … so — double result: "Because it rained so we stayed" ❌ → use one: "Because it rained, we stayed" or "It rained, so we stayed."
- Using unless … not: "Unless you don't call" ❌ — unless already contains negation: "Unless you call."
- Fragment sentences: starting a sentence with a subordinating conjunction but not completing the main clause: "Because he left." ❌
- Confusing while (time/concession) with whereas (direct contrast): they overlap but "whereas" is purely contrastive.
- Time: when, while, as, after, before, until, till, since, once, as soon as, whenever, by the time
- Cause/Reason: because, since, as, now that, seeing that, inasmuch as
- Condition: if, unless, provided that, providing, as long as, in case, supposing, on condition that
- Concession: although, though, even though, even if, while, whereas, despite the fact that
- Purpose: so that, in order that, lest (formal/archaic)
- Result/Degree: so … that, such … that
- Comparison: as … as, than, as if, as though, just as
- Place: where, wherever, everywhere
- Manner: as, as if, as though, how
What Are Correlative Conjunctions?
They always appear in pairs and work together to join grammatically equal elements. The two elements must be parallel in structure.
Both … And
Emphasises that two things are equally true or applicable.
Either … Or
Presents two alternatives. Only one of the options is chosen or applies.
Neither … Nor
Negates both options equally. The sentence already carries negation — no extra not is needed.
Not Only … But Also
Adds emphasis by listing two things, with the second being more surprising or important.
No Sooner … Than & Hardly … When
Express that one thing happened immediately after another. Both require subject–auxiliary inversion.
- Faulty parallelism — the most common error: "Either to eat or sleeping" ❌ → "Either to eat or to sleep / either eating or sleeping."
- Neither … or ❌ → must be neither … nor.
- Both … as well as ❌ (redundant) → use both … and or … as well as … alone.
- No sooner … when ❌ → no sooner … than. Hardly … than ❌ → hardly … when.
- Subject–verb agreement: with either … or and neither … nor, verb agrees with the closer subject: "Neither the students nor the teacher was ready."
- Not only at the start without inversion: "Not only she came late" ❌ → "Not only did she come late."
Conjunctive Adverbs
These are adverbs that act as connectors between two independent clauses. Unlike true conjunctions, they require a semicolon (or a full stop) before them, and a comma after them.
Contrast — however, nevertheless, nonetheless, still, on the other hand
Cause & Result — therefore, consequently, thus, as a result
Addition — moreover, furthermore, besides, in addition, likewise
Other Key Conjunctive Adverbs — otherwise, meanwhile, instead, indeed
- Comma splice — using only a comma: "She was tired, however she continued" ❌ → "She was tired; however, she continued."
- Treating conjunctive adverbs like conjunctions (no semicolon): "I was tired, therefore I left" ❌ → "I was tired; therefore, I left."
- Forgetting the comma after the conjunctive adverb: "However she continued" ❌ → "However, she continued."
- Confusing however (conjunctive adverb) with but (conjunction): "but" directly joins clauses with a comma; "however" needs a semicolon.
- Therefore vs so: "so" is a conjunction (comma + so); "therefore" is a conjunctive adverb (semicolon + therefore + comma).
- Coordinating (FANBOYS): Use a comma + conjunction to join two independent clauses. No comma needed for phrases.
- Subordinating: Dependent clause first → comma after it. Dependent clause last → usually no comma. Never use will after time/conditional conjunctions.
- Correlative: Both parts must join parallel structures. Verb agrees with the closest subject (for either…or / neither…nor).
- Conjunctive adverbs: Always use a semicolon (or period) before them, and a comma after. They are moveable within the second clause.
- Quick test — if you can remove the connecting word and still have two complete sentences, you likely need a semicolon (conjunctive adverb) rather than a comma (conjunction).
- Addition: and, both…and, not only…but also, moreover, furthermore, besides, in addition, likewise, also
- Contrast: but, yet, although, though, even though, whereas, while, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, on the other hand, still
- Cause/Reason: because, since, as, for, now that, inasmuch as
- Result/Consequence: so, so that, therefore, consequently, thus, as a result, hence
- Condition: if, unless, provided that, as long as, in case, on condition that, supposing
- Time: when, while, as, after, before, until, since, once, as soon as, whenever, by the time, no sooner…than
- Concession: although, though, even though, even if, despite the fact that, granted that
- Purpose: so that, in order that, lest
- Alternative: or, either…or, otherwise, instead
- Emphasis/Clarification: indeed, in fact, that is, namely